by Kevin Proescholdt
The recent decision by Forest Service District Ranger Crystal Powell to deny the permit to run the La Luz Trail Run race through the Sandia Mountain Wilderness may be understandably unpopular with some runners and race organizers (“La Luz race hits end of trail as Forest Service denies permit,” Albuquerque Journal, May 15). But this decision is the proper one to protect the wilderness character of this iconic area.
Wilderness is the most protective land designation in the United States. My organization, Wilderness Watch, works to safeguard Wildernesses around the country. We often challenge Forest Service decisions and occasionally take the agency to court when it violates the 1964 Wilderness Act. But in the case of the La Luz race permit, the Forest Service has made the right decision in accordance with the Wilderness Act and agency policies, and there are good reasons for runners and others to support this decision.
Wildernesses contain a huge array of values, many of them intangible like protecting opportunities for solitude, and some of them more tangible like protecting wildlife and increasingly scarce habitat. These values go far deeper than physical impacts to trails or whether litter is left behind. Wildernesses are emblematic of our human recognition of their inherent wildness, and symbolic of our society’s need for restraint and humility in dealing with them. By designating an area as wilderness, we recognize that area’s right to function on its own, without the active management and manipulation used on other federal lands and without the types of intensive intrusions prominent there.
Commercial activities and competitive races degrade a wilderness’s wild character. They detract from an area’s wildness and make an area more like the lands overrun by civilization, rather than “in contrast with those areas where man and his works dominate the landscape,” as the Wilderness Act states. That’s why the framers of the Wilderness Act and Congress included a prohibition on commercial activities in designated wildernesses, with only a very narrow exception for some outfitting and guiding activities. The Forest Service’s wilderness regulations also contain prohibitions on commercial activities and competitive events.
I sympathize with organizers of the trail run, particularly when the race has occurred since before Congress designated the Sandia Mountain Wilderness. But all across the country are examples of activities once allowed in areas that have needed to end after an area was designated as wilderness, all to better protect the wild character of these special lands for future generations and for wildlife, which are continually squeezed into smaller and smaller pockets of secure habitat. In Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW), for example, the 1978 BWCAW Act ended many activities, including a competitive international canoe race, to better protect the area.
Other options likely exist for the race. A few years back, the organizers of a winter sled dog race wanted to route its race through a portion of the BWCAW. The Forest Service appropriately rejected that proposed route, and the race organizers eventually selected a different route. That outcome—finding another venue or route outside of designated wilderness—may also well work for La Luz Trail Run, a far better outcome than weakening protections for the Sandia Mountain Wilderness.
Editor's note: Kevin's piece ran in the Albuquerque Journal on 5/31: https://www.abqjournal.com/2395565/ending-la-lu-zrun-safeguards-wilderness-2.html
------------------
Wilderness Watch
P.O. Box 9175
Missoula, MT 59807
P: 406.542.2048
Press Inquiries: 406.542.2048 x2
E: wild@wildernesswatch.org
Minneapolis, MN Office
2833 43rd Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
P: 612.201.9266
Moscow, ID Office
P.O. Box 9765
Moscow, ID 83843
Comments 219
I commend this decision by Forest Service District Ranger Crystal Powell to deny the trail run.
At the end of the day, protecting the sanctity that is Wilderness is paramount.
Allowing a trail run would have set a terrible and inevitably destructive precedent, opening the door to more incursions into areas that have been designated and preserved for wildlife and sensitive flora.
Thank you, District Ranger Powell. Those who love Wilderness and wildlife will not forget this!
Thank you for protecting the Sandia Mountain Wilderness, which should be left natural.
We've taken too much pristine land and turned it into concrete jungles. Let's preserve what's left and skip the race.
Wildernesses have to protected and repetitive use minimized to preserve these precious spaces.
Live and let live. (Mic dropped)
Thank you for protecting wilderness areas. We have precious little left in this great country so let's preserve it! This way, all can enjoy it.
This is a good call. Thank you!
I support this completely. I’m sorry the runners have to miss this, but our forest, beaches, other lands have to be protected
The wilderness is the home of the wild things. Running through it would be the same as running through someone else's house without regard. Humans have this idea that everything is theirs for the taking. Humans don't belong in the wilderness.
Thank you! Keep the wilderness wild.
Humans must stop trampling all over the planet, the planet and all it's wild places are quickly becoming nonexistent! Run someplace else! The earth and all the living things that inhabit it are not human property! No person would want to be someone or something else's property, especially with the sole purpose of being abused and ultimately killed! So don't do it to anything else!
I LOVE this decision. We need more animal lands FREE OF PEOPLE. The wilderness should be an animal place, not acceptable for humans to run their foolish races. Humans dominate this small planet. Humans and wildlife do not mix. The Half Earth Project would be a start......50% of the planet well selected to prohibit humans.
THANK YOU!!! FINALLYWILDERNESS, AND THE CREATURES WHO, DESPITE HUMAN ACTIVITY, FIGHT TO THRIVE!
WE'VE DESTROYED SO MUCH....THE NATURAL WORLD IS DYING! SORRY, FIND ANOTHER PLACE TO RUN YOUR LITTLE RACE
I completely agree!!!
Wilderness should be protected. A race can be done anywhere, so having a race in a wilderness area is not necessary and is of no benefit to the land
The Forest Service has made the right decision in accordance with the Wilderness Act and agency policies, and there are good reasons. I support that decision as runners and others that engage in such activities can find many other areas that can provide the same challenges they seek. We must continue to keep our Wilderness area as nature has provided.
No to the race...we need to stop violating the lands that other inhabitants of this earth need to survive. Enough is enough.
I agree with this decision.
An event like a race in wilderness can disrupt habitat with noise and extra stress for wildlife, but also could damage habitat more directly with damage to vegetation or impaction of soil. Please leave wilderness alone.
The wilderness is a gift to of us especially the wildlife.