Wilderness Watch is keeping an eye on the actions of the 115th Congress. In addition to tracking wilderness bills and working to derail those that would harm Wilderness, we’re working with Congress to improve oversight of and support for the federal agencies’ wilderness programs.

We're seeing that all the talk of “change” hasn’t yet reached the halls of Congress when it comes to some wilderness legislation. One might have hoped that Wilderness would get a reprieve from being used as a form of currency to be bartered for political favors. Sad to say, but so far old habits still hold sway.

Wilderness Watch has developed a new tool to help track wilderness bills in the current Congress. It is a running tally of bills, pointing out the bad bills and their flaws, along with the good bills.

 

View current wilderness bills in Congress.


Wilderness in Congress: The Expected Onslaught, Spring 2017

Wild public lands in the United States, especially those lands designated by Congress as Wilderness under the 1964 Wilderness Act, face the most serious threats and assaults in the half-century since the landmark law passed Congress.  The new 115th Congress that began in 2017 is probably the most virulently anti-wilderness Congress ever, with wilderness-hating members chairing the key committees in both the House and Senate.  That, coupled with the new bull-in-the-china-shop, pro-development Trump Administration, spells HUGE trouble for Wilderness.  The 1964 Wilderness Act itself might easily be gutted.  The very idea and definition of Wilderness could be lost.

Up until this year, even though the Republican party held majorities in both the House and Senate, anti-wilderness Republicans in Congress knew that their most egregious bills wouldn’t likely pass muster with the Obama Administration.  And the Obama Administration did oppose many of the worst bills, testifying against some of the bills and threatening vetoes against others.

But now the backstop of the Obama Administration is gone.  The new Trump Administration’s positions on Wilderness are not entirely clear at this point, but the early indications of advancing oil and gas drilling on public lands, of approving the construction of oil and tar sands pipelines, of promoting coal development, and of denying climate change all indicate that the new administration is more interested in developing public lands rather than protecting them.  And without the backstop of the Obama Administration, the anti-wilderness Members of Congress are gearing up their attack on Wilderness, figuratively salivating at the opportunity to pass their worst anti-wilderness bills and have them signed into law by Donald Trump.

Already the bill introductions have begun. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Rep. Don Young (R-AK) have introduced bills (S. 101/HR 218) to force construction of a new road through the heart of the Izembek Wilderness in Alaska, which Wilderness Watch has fought since 2009. Sen. Murkowski, who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has pushed this issue hard for many years and may finally succeed this time around.

Other expected bills to damage Wilderness will likely soon come, too.  These include bills we fought in the last Congress, such as the bill to open up all Wildernesses nationwide to mountain biking, and the bill to open the entire National Wilderness Preservation System to commercial filming.  The Utah Public Lands Initiative (PLI), which would radically weaken the very definition of Wilderness, may well be reintroduced again by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), who chairs the Natural Resources Committee. And legislation has just been introduced (H.J. Res. 35) to overturn protections for bears, wolves, wolverines, and other native carnivores in national wildlife refuges in Alaska.

But perhaps the most sinister bill that will surely be reintroduced is the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act.  Last year’s House version of this bill would allow nearly unlimited damage and manipulation of Wildernesses by state or federal agencies if even remotely connected to hunting, fishing, shooting sports, or fish and wildlife management.  Many state agencies in many western states despise federal Wildernesses, and this bill would allow them to drive motor vehicles into Wilderness, build water developments, conduct logging or chaining, or engage in all sorts of other ecological manipulations if even remotely done for some habitat purpose.  These provisions would even allow a state game agency, for example, to bulldoze a road for 10 miles into a Wilderness, build a dam, stock fish, build a cabin for employees, and then drive their pickups into the Wilderness to check on their fish.  Of all the anti-wilderness bills introduced in recent Congresses, the Sportsmen’s Heritage Act is the most destructive to Wilderness and the least understood.

So what can we do to fight against this terribly grim outlook for Wilderness?  At Wilderness Watch, we’re organizing to resist the onslaught. We will work with our colleague organizations, we will notify and activate the public, and we will fight the anti-wilderness congressional agenda.  We will also work to educate and activate our supporters in the U.S. Senate who, even though they are in the minority, still retain influence to stall or block some of the bad anti-wilderness bills through the threat of filibusters.  We are also creating a new organizer staff position to help activate citizens to counter the threats.  And we will continue to call on our committed members and supporters to help save our priceless wilderness heritage for future generations.  Please join with us to save the wild!


TO FIND AND CONTACT MEMBERS OF CONGRESS:

 Visit: https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials

 

You can write your senator or representative at:
Senator (Name), US Senate
Washington D.C. 20510

Representative (Name), US House of Representatives
Washington D.C. 20515.

 

SOME TIPS FOR CONTACTING CONGRESS:

  1. Personal letters, either hand-written or typed, make a greater impact than email. It’s best to also fax your letter because security measures may delay mail delivery to Congress. "CC'ing" your letter (or email) to the chair of the appropriate committee(s) is a good idea too, as committee chairs play an important role on most legislation.
  2. Phone calls are an effective way to let your elected official know that you are for or against a particular bill. But you shouldn’t an intern or receptionist who answers phones to relay a detailed or complex concern to your Congressperson–they may not convey them accurately.
  3. Email is not always the most effective means of communicating with Congress, but it’s easy to do, and unlike a phone call, your words are delivered by you, rather than interpreted by someone else. Remember to always include your address and phone number. This makes you a "real" person, rather than a contact spot on the internet, and it lets your Congressperson know that you are a constituent.

Contact Us

Wilderness Watch
P.O. Box 9175
Missoula, MT 59807
P: 406-542-2048
E: wild@wildernesswatch.org

Minneapolis, MN Office
2833 43rd Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406

P: 612-201-9266

Moscow, ID Office
P.O. Box 9623
Moscow, ID 83843

Follow Us

Stay Connected

facebook round 38  twitter round 38  youtube round 38

Search

Go to top