Wilderness Watch is opposing the latest effort by the Forest Service (FS) to drastically increase the amount of commercial pack stock outfitting and guiding from current levels in the Pasayten and Lake Chelan-Sawtooth Wildernesses east of the Cascade crest in Washington State. This is some of the wildest country in the lower 48 states, providing habitat for rare lynx, spotted owls, grizzlies, and wolves.

Commercial interests exert undue influence over public land management and commercial pack stock outfits in the Pasayten and Lake Chelan-Sawtooth Wildernesses are no exception. They have resisted restrictions that are necessary to protect Wilderness, and the amount of damage they cause would land most users in front of a judge. Their political influence makes them untouchable, something almost every conscientious wilderness ranger or manager can attest to. This is why the wilderness leaders who fought to pass the Wilderness Act resisted allowing any commercial enterprise in Wilderness, and why it makes no sense to propose increasing their use.

Despite evidence of damage from existing use, the agency’s reissued Pack and Saddle Stock Outfitter-Guide Special Use Permit Issuance Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) seeks to allow even more use by commercial outfitters and guides. Wilderness Watch successfully challenged an earlier plan in 2013 that would have nearly doubled such use.

Problems with the proposed plan

Currently, the outfitter camps fail to meet forest plan standards for protection of the Wildernesses. Areas denuded of vegetation at campsites exceed allowable limits, yet instead of reducing outfitter use the Forest Service is proposing to amend its forest plans to allow much larger “barren core” areas in order to accommodate excessively large stock party sizes (12 people and 18 head of stock). Additionally, the agency is proposing to allow outfitters to use existing camps closer than 200 feet from meadows, streams, lakes, and other sensitive habitats.

The proposed plan also fails to meet the Wilderness Act’s requirement that commercial services be limited to only those that are “necessary” to achieve the public purposes of Wilderness. The agency has failed to show that even the current level of use is necessary for anything other than meeting the economic interest of the outfitters, yet it is proposing to dramatically increase use. Outfitted use has averaged between 1,000-1,500 user days over the past decade, yet the plan proposes to increase this to 2,377 days, a substantial increase in use and, undoubtedly, impacts. Such a big increase is not only unnecessary, but is irresponsible considering the damage by current levels of use.

Alternative 3 in the SDEIS comes closest to meeting the letter and spirit of the Wilderness Act. It reduces party size to 12 “heartbeats” (a combination of people and stock not to exceed 12), and allows the least amount of commercial use, 25 percent over the past five years’ average. However, even Alternative 3 proposes to allocate more use than the average of the past several years.

We let the FS know it needs to consider other alternatives that would protect the Pasayten and Lake Chelan-Sawtooth Wildernesses from the abuses of commercial interests. In our SDEIS comments, we urged the agency to:

• Reduce party sizes from 18 head of stock to a maximum of nine (a number based on wilderness research) or adopt the 12 “heartbeat” limit for all groups;
• Retain existing rules that keep campsites away from streams and other sensitive areas;
• Maintain current forest plan standards for barren core areas at campsites and require outfitters to modify their operations to allow existing soil and vegetation damage to heal;
• Reduced allocated commercial use to only that which is necessary, somewhere below the 10-year maximum of 1,500 service days; and
• Focus on protecting the wild character of these two Wildernesses rather than catering to the economic interests of a few.

• Read our comments